
Radeon VE vs RADEON 9250

Radeon VE
Popular choices:

RADEON 9250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon VE uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon VE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON 9250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon VE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $49 for the Radeon VE, it costs 49% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 194% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+194%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon VE and RADEON 9250

Radeon VE
The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

RADEON 9250
The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon VE scores 2 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the RADEON 9250 leads by 50%. The Radeon VE is built on GCN 5.1 while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon VE) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250). Boost clocks: 1750 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2 | 3+50% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+88% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.44 TFLOPS+228% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1750 MHz+75% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon VE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 has 256 MB. The Radeon VE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon VE) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON 9250) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon VE draws 295W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 102.6% difference. The RADEON 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon VE) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 95W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 165mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon VE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79 and now averages $25. The RADEON 9250 costs 49% less ($24 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Radeon VE) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9250) — the RADEON 9250 offers 100+% better value. The Radeon VE is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $25-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Amethyst |
| Release | February 7 2019 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #125 | #420 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











