Radeon VE vs GeForce2 MX 100/200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon VE uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon VE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon VE.

Insight	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%)	✅Leading raw performance (+50%)
Longevity	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 50% better value per dollar than the Radeon VE.

Insight	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+50%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon VE Benchmark Check

GeForce2 MX 100/200 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon VE and GeForce2 MX 100/200

Radeon VE

The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce2 MX 100/200

The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon VE scores 2 versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 3 — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 leads by 50%. The Radeon VE is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon VE) vs 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Raw compute: 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Boost clocks: 1750 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
G3D Mark Score	2	3+50%
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Pascal
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+900%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.44 TFLOPS+1586%	0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1750 MHz+69%	1038 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	240+900%	24
L1 Cache	960 KB+567%	144 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon VE) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7_0 (Radeon VE) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
DirectX	7_0	7.0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon VE draws 295W versus the GeForce2 MX 100/200's 10W — a 186.9% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon VE) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 165mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon VE	GeForce2 MX 100/200
TDP	295W	10W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	165mm	165mm
Height	—	64mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	—	55
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon VE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce2 MX 100/200 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Radeon VE) vs 0.1 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) — the GeForce2 MX 100/200 offers 100+% better value. The Radeon VE is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).