
Radeon VE vs RADEON 9200 SE

Radeon VE
Popular choices:

RADEON 9200 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9200 SE is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RADEON 9200 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon VE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9200 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon VE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9200 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon VE, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 390% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+390%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon VE and RADEON 9200 SE

Radeon VE
The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

RADEON 9200 SE
The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon VE scores 2 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the RADEON 9200 SE leads by 50%. The Radeon VE is built on GCN 5.1 while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon VE) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 1750 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2 | 3+50% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+50% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.44 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | 2900 MHz+66% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon VE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE has 256 MB. The Radeon VE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon VE) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7_0 (Radeon VE) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7_0 | 8.1+16% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon VE draws 295W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 137.1% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon VE) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 165mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 55W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 165mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon VE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30 and now averages $15. The RADEON 9200 SE costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Radeon VE) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the RADEON 9200 SE offers 100+% better value. The RADEON 9200 SE is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon VE | RADEON 9200 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $30 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Strix Halo |
| Release | February 7 2019 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #125 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















