Radeon VE vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon VE is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon VE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 100% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon VE.

Insight	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-100%)	✅Leading raw performance (+100%)
Longevity	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 100% better value per dollar than the Radeon VE.

Insight	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+100%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon VE Benchmark Check

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon VE and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

Radeon VE

The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon VE scores 2 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 100%. The Radeon VE is built on GCN 5.1 while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon VE) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

Feature	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	2	4+100%
Architecture	GCN 5.1	TeraScale 2
Process Node	7 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	3840+380%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.44 TFLOPS+1100%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	240+500%	40
L1 Cache	960 KB+1100%	80 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon VE) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7_0 (Radeon VE) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX	7_0	8.1+16%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon VE draws 295W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 186.9% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon VE) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 165mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon VE	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP	295W	10W-97%
Recommended PSU	350W	0W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	165mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon VE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Radeon VE) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 100+% better value. The Radeon VE is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).