
Radeon VE vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200

Radeon VE
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon VE is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon VE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon VE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon VE, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 390% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+390%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon VE and MOBILITY RADEON 9200

Radeon VE
The Radeon VE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 7 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1750 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2 points. Launch price was $699.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200
The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon VE scores 2 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 leads by 50%. The Radeon VE is built on GCN 5.1 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon VE) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 13.44 TFLOPS (Radeon VE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).
| Feature | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2 | 3+50% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+380% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.44 TFLOPS+1100% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+500% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon VE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB. The Radeon VE offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon VE) vs 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the Radeon VE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7_0 (Radeon VE) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7_0 | 8.1+16% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon VE draws 295W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 142% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon VE) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 50W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 165mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon VE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.0 (Radeon VE) vs 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 100+% better value. The Radeon VE is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon VE | MOBILITY RADEON 9200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Broadway |
| Release | February 7 2019 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #125 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















