RADEON X300SE vs GeForce PCX 5750
RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X300SE is positioned at rank 343 and the GeForce PCX 5750 is on rank 366, so the RADEON X300SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X300SE is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The RADEON X300SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X300SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce PCX 5750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $60 for the RADEON X300SE, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 268.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+268.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X300SE and GeForce PCX 5750
RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X300SE scores 38 versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 35 — the RADEON X300SE leads by 8.6%. The RADEON X300SE is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (RADEON X300SE) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38+9% | 35 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+193% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+230% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 88+47% | 60 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+138% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X300SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5750 has 128 MB. The RADEON X300SE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+138% | 0.63 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X300SE draws 100W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 74.6% difference. The RADEON X300SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X300SE) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-54% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X300SE launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. The GeForce PCX 5750 costs 75% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce PCX 5750 offers 283.3% better value. The RADEON X300SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-60% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $15-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | 2.3+283% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GF110 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #336 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X300SE and GeForce PCX 5750
