Radeon Xpress 1300M vs GeForce 6200
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
GeForce 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is positioned at rank 363 and the GeForce 6200 is on rank 734, so the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6200.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300M and GeForce 6200
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
GeForce 6200
The GeForce 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300M scores 40 versus the GeForce 6200's 37 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 8.1%. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce 6200 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 384 (GeForce 6200). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6200). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40+8% | 37 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+301% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+20% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Xpress 1300M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6200 has 256 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce 6200) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs No (GeForce 6200). Decoder: None vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6200).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1300M draws 85W versus the GeForce 6200's 10W — a 157.9% difference. The GeForce 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 350W (GeForce 6200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 10W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 3.7+640% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Xpress 1300M and GeForce 6200
