CPU
GPU
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is positioned at rank #363 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 78845% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1300M.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-78845%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+78845%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300M scores 40 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 78845%. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40 | 31,578+78845% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 7680+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+1153% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2610 MHz+109% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Xpress 1300M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Xpress 1300M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1300M draws 85W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 108.1% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-70% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 110.8+22060% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | AD104 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #403 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Xpress 1300M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
