CPU
GPU
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
Quadro NVS 110M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is positioned at rank 363 and the Quadro NVS 110M is on rank 221, so the Quadro NVS 110M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 110M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro NVS 110M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro NVS 110M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1300M.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1300M | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+20%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro NVS 110M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300M and Quadro NVS 110M
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Quadro NVS 110M
The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300M scores 40 versus the Quadro NVS 110M's 48 — the Quadro NVS 110M leads by 20%. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro NVS 110M uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 110M). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40 | 48+20% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+490% | 0.5422 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro NVS 110M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1300M draws 85W versus the Quadro NVS 110M's 45W — a 61.5% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 110M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | Quadro NVS 110M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 45W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.1+120% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Xpress 1300M and Quadro NVS 110M
