
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is positioned at rank 363 and the GeForce FX 5700 is on rank 367, so the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300M and GeForce FX 5700

Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Xpress 1300M scores 40 and the GeForce FX 5700 reaches 41 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce FX 5700 uses Rankine, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 480 (GeForce FX 5700). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40 | 41+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+167% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS+128% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 80+33% | 60 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Xpress 1300M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce FX 5700) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1300M draws 85W versus the GeForce FX 5700's 219W — a 88.2% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-61% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+150% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | GeForce FX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GF110 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #403 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















