Radeon Xpress 1300M
VS
Quadro FX 350M

Radeon Xpress 1300M vs Quadro FX 350M

AMD

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is positioned at rank 363 and the Quadro FX 350M is on rank 228, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M

#348
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18016%
#363
Radeon Xpress 1300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
99%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
98%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
98%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
96%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
95%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
95%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
87%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
83%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
80%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
79%
#374
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
74%
#375
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
74%
#376
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
74%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
73%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M

#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
98%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
96%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
93%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
93%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
91%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
84%
#101
81%
#213
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3283%
#228
Quadro FX 350M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
96%
#238
FirePro 3D V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
81%
#240
Quadro K600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
81%
#241
FirePro S7000
MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40
80%
#242
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
80%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-12.5%)
Leading raw performance (+12.5%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300M and Quadro FX 350M

AMD

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300M scores 40 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 12.5%. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

FeatureRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score
40
45+13%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1280+433%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.2 TFLOPS+414%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Xpress 1300M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 350M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).

FeatureRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
None
PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Xpress 1300M draws 85W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Xpress 1300MQuadro FX 350M
TDP
85W-55%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.5+150%
0.2