Radeon Xpress 1300M vs RADEON X300SE
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is positioned at rank 363 and the RADEON X300SE is on rank 343, so the RADEON X300SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X300SE.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1300M | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300M and RADEON X300SE
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300M scores 40 versus the RADEON X300SE's 38 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 5.3%. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON X300SE uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 1,408 (RADEON X300SE). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 40+5% | 38 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1408+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1645 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1300M draws 85W versus the RADEON X300SE's 100W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M) vs 350W (RADEON X300SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-15% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X300SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300M | RADEON X300SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $60 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 14 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #403 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Xpress 1300M and RADEON X300SE
