RadeonT 610M vs Firepro M4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank #232 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

99%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

91%

#222

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

498%

#224

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

451%

#225

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

450%

#229

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

409%

#230

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

407%

#232

RadeonT 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

99%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

97%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

95%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro M4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro M4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RadeonT 610M Benchmark Check

Firepro M4100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and Firepro M4100

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

Firepro M4100

The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the Firepro M4100 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Firepro M4100 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RadeonT 610M) vs 384 (Firepro M4100). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100).

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
G3D Mark Score	1,068	1,059
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	128	384+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5632 TFLOPS+9%	0.5146 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8+100%
TMUs	8	24+200%
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RadeonT 610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Firepro M4100 has 2 GB. The Firepro M4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.25 MB (Firepro M4100) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Firepro M4100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M) vs VCE 1.0 (Firepro M4100). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M) vs H.264,VC-1 (Firepro M4100).

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG	H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the Firepro M4100's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 350W (Firepro M4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Firepro M4100
TDP	15W-50%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	82mm
Height	—	70mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	71.2+102%	35.3