RadeonT 610M vs Radeon 625
RadeonT 610M
Popular choices:
Radeon 625
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank 232 and the Radeon 625 is on rank 357, so the RadeonT 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 625 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 610M.
| Insight | RadeonT 610M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 625 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and Radeon 625
RadeonT 610M
The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.
Radeon 625
The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the Radeon 625 reaches 1,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon 625 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RadeonT 610M) vs 384 (Radeon 625). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,068 | 1,077 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 384+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+115% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 8 | 24+200% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 625) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the Radeon 625's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 350W (Radeon 625). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 71.2+231% | 21.5 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon 625 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Dragon Range | Polaris 24 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #843 | #858 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT 610M and Radeon 625
