RadeonT 610M vs Radeon R7 430
RadeonT 610M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank 232 and the Radeon R7 430 is on rank 99, so the Radeon R7 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 430
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 430 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 430 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 610M.
| Insight | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 430 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and Radeon R7 430
RadeonT 610M
The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.
Radeon R7 430
The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the Radeon R7 430 reaches 1,093 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R7 430 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RadeonT 610M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 430). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,068 | 1,093+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 1024+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+255% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+126% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 32+700% |
| TMUs | 8 | 64+700% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 430) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 430's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 300W (Radeon R7 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 71.2+553% | 10.9 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $15 |
| Codename | Dragon Range | Trinidad |
| Release | January 3 2023 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #843 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT 610M and Radeon R7 430
