RadeonT 610M
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

RadeonT 610M vs Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

AMD

RadeonT 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
VS

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

2018

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank 232 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is on rank 465, so the RadeonT 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
99%
#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
91%
#222
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
498%
#224
451%
#225
450%
#229
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
409%
#230
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
407%
#232
RadeonT 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#235
Radeon RX 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#236
Radeon HD 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#237
Radeon HD 7570M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15
97%
#239
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#240
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
95%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

#455
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2026%
#457
1836%
#458
1831%
#462
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1665%
#463
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1654%
#465
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
100%
#466
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#467
99%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
99%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#470
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
98%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#474
95%
#475
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: $118
95%
#476
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#477
94%
#479
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
MSRP: $699|Avg: $150
93%
#480
Radeon R5 M330
MSRP: $120|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RadeonT 610M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeonT 610MQualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

AMD

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU reaches 1,072 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureRadeonT 610MQualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
G3D Mark Score
1,068
1,072
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeonT 610MQualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RadeonT 610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB. The RadeonT 610M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeonT 610MQualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU's 7W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeonT 610MQualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
TDP
15W
7W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
71.2
153.1+115%
💰

Value Analysis

The RadeonT 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeonT 610MQualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$100
Codename
Dragon Range
Release
January 3 2023
December 6 2018
Ranking
#843
#860