RadeonT 610M vs GeForce 840M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank 232 and the GeForce 840M is on rank 352, so the RadeonT 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

99%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

91%

#222

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

498%

#224

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

451%

#225

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

450%

#229

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

409%

#230

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

407%

#232

RadeonT 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

99%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

97%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

95%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 840M

#342

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

987%

#344

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

895%

#345

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

892%

#349

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

811%

#350

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

806%

#352

GeForce 840M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

99%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

98%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

97%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

97%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

95%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

95%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 840M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 840M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 610M.

Insight	RadeonT 610M	GeForce 840M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 840M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RadeonT 610M Benchmark Check

GeForce 840M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and GeForce 840M

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

GeForce 840M

The GeForce 840M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the GeForce 840M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 840M uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RadeonT 610M) vs 384 (GeForce 840M). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 840M). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	GeForce 840M
G3D Mark Score	1,068	1,100+3%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	128	384+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5632 TFLOPS	0.8632 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	2200 MHz+96%	1124 MHz
ROPs	4	8+100%
TMUs	8	16+100%
L1 Cache	32 KB	192 KB+500%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RadeonT 610M	GeForce 840M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RadeonT 610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 840M has 2 GB. The GeForce 840M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 840M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	GeForce 840M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M) vs 11.0 (GeForce 840M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	GeForce 840M
DirectX	12 (12_2)+9%	11.0
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 840M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 840M).

Feature	RadeonT 610M	GeForce 840M
Encoder	VCN 3.0	NVENC 2.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the GeForce 840M's 33W — a 75% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 350W (GeForce 840M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.