CPU
GPU
RadeonT 610M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank 232 and the Radeon R7 M350 is on rank 359, so the RadeonT 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M350 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RadeonT 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M350.
| Insight | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and Radeon R7 M350
RadeonT 610M
The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.
Radeon R7 M350
The Radeon R7 M350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,066 points.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the Radeon R7 M350 reaches 1,066 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M350 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RadeonT 610M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M350). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.7795 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M350). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,068 | 1,066 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 384+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 0.7795 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+167% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 8+100% |
| TMUs | 8 | 24+200% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M350) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 M350's 35W — a 80% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-57% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 71.2+133% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | RadeonT 610M | Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | Dragon Range | Meso |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #843 | #862 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT 610M and Radeon R7 M350
