RadeonT 610M vs Radeon R7 250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RadeonT 610M is positioned at rank 232 and the Radeon R7 250 is on rank 107, so the Radeon R7 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

99%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

91%

#222

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

498%

#224

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

451%

#225

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

450%

#229

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

409%

#230

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

407%

#232

RadeonT 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

99%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

97%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

95%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 250

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

614%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

590%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

583%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

582%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

581%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

578%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

570%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

568%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

563%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

562%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

555%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

554%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

544%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

543%

#91

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

677%

#106

GeForce GT 640

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

100%

#107

Radeon R7 250

MSRP: $89|Avg: $25

100%

#108

GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

100%

#110

Radeon HD 8550D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

#111

Radeon 520

MSRP: $78|Avg: $78

95%

#112

Radeon HD 4810

MSRP: $70|Avg: $15

94%

#114

GeForce 605

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#115

Radeon HD 8410G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

92%

#116

RADEON HD6530D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

90%

#117

Moore Threads MTT S30

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

89%

#118

Radeon 535

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

89%

#121

GeForce GTS 450

MSRP: $129|Avg: $20

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	RadeonT 610M	Radeon R7 250
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RadeonT 610M Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 250 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT 610M and Radeon R7 250

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RadeonT 610M scores 1,068 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT 610M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (RadeonT 610M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	1,068+2%	1,051
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	128	384+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5632 TFLOPS	0.8064 TFLOPS+43%
Boost Clock	2200 MHz+110%	1050 MHz
ROPs	4	8+100%
TMUs	8	24+200%
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RadeonT 610M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB. The Radeon R7 250 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Radeon R7 250
DirectX	12 (12_2)+8%	11.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).

Feature	RadeonT 610M	Radeon R7 250
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RadeonT 610M draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 125% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RadeonT 610M) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.