RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs Quadro RTX 8000
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 8000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and Quadro RTX 8000
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Quadro RTX 8000
The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 20,312 and the Quadro RTX 8000 reaches 19,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 400 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+2% | 19,927 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+178% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+300% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+44% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+83% | 96 |
| TMUs | 400+39% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+178% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+39% | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 576+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 768 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 175W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 39.1% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-33% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.1+52% | 76.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $9999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $9999 |
| Codename | AD102 | TU102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #16 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and Quadro RTX 8000
