RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (32 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $600 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 575.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+575.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095) | ✅More affordable ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 and the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER reaches 29,958 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) with 400 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269+1% | 29,958 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+79% | 7168 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+84% | 35.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+3% | 2475 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+120% | 80 |
| TMUs | 400+79% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+79% | 7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+50% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+79% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+79% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 14.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+14% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+50% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 220W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 245mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1 | 136.2+12% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 and now averages $600. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 85.3% less ($3495 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 49.9 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 574.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $599-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4095 | $600-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 49.9+574% |
| Codename | AD102 | AD104 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #16 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
