
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Very Large (Check Case) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,100 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 261.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+261.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095) | ✅More affordable ($1,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 and the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti reaches 29,395 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1860 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) with 400 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269+3% | 29,395 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+19% | 10752 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+63% | 40 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+37% | 1860 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+57% | 112 |
| TMUs | 400+19% | 336 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+19% | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+19% | 84 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+19% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 57.1% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 336mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-44% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 336mm |
| Height | 111mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1+85% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 and now averages $1100. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti costs 73.1% less ($2995 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 26.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 260.8% better value. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $1999-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4095 | $1100-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 26.7+261% |
| Codename | AD102 | GA102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #16 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














