RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

169%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

167%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

164%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

164%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

159%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

156%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

144%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

137%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

119%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

114%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

100%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

94%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

93%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

92%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

89%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

88%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

85%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

83%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

82%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

80%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

79%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

77%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

74%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

72%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

71%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

70%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 284.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (32 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+284.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-284.7%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (32 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 98% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 1319.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1319.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1650

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 284.7%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	30,269+285%	7,869
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	12800+1329%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	65.28 TFLOPS+2088%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2550 MHz+53%	1665 MHz
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	400+614%	56
L1 Cache	12.5 MB+1320%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	72 MB+7100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 350% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6 ECC	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	576 GB/s+350%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	72 MB+7100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 16-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	RTX 5000 Ada Generation	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	16-pin	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	121.1+15%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.2% less ($4020 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1317.6% better value. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).