RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs L40
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
L40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar L40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The L40 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (48 GB vs 32 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 5000 Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $4,095 versus $8,174 for the L40, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 85.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+85.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($4,095) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,174) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and L40
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
L40
The L40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 13 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 2490 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,601 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 versus the L40's 32,601 — the L40 leads by 7.7%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the L40 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 18,176 (L40). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 90.52 TFLOPS (L40). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2490 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 142 (L40) with 400 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269 | 32,601+8% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800 | 18176+42% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS | 90.52 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+2% | 2490 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 192+9% |
| TMUs | 400 | 568+42% |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB | 17.8 MB+42% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100 | 142+42% |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 568+42% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the L40 has 48 GB. The L40 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 960 GB/s (L40) — a 66.7% advantage for the L40. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 96 MB (L40) — the L40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 960 GB/s+67% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (L40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L40). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (L40).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the L40's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 750W (L40). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1+11% | 108.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the L40 launched at $31000 and now averages $8174. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation costs 49.9% less ($4079 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 4.0 (L40) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 85% better value. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | L40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000-87% | $31000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4095-50% | $8174 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4+85% | 4.0 |
| Codename | AD102 | AD102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | October 13 2022 |
| Ranking | #16 | #61 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation and L40
