
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 5090 D v2

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 5000 Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $4,086.44 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 0% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 0.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095) | ✅More affordable ($4,086.44) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 5090 D v2

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,399 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 and the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 reaches 30,399 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) with 400 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269 | 30,399 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800 | 21760+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+6% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 400 | 680+70% |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB | 21.3 MB+70% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100 | 170+70% |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 680+70% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 32 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 1792 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) — a 211.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+211% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2's 575W — a 78.8% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-57% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-35% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1+129% | 52.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 launched at $1999 and now averages $4086.44. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 costs 0.2% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.4 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 7.4 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 offers 0% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $1999-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4095 | $4086.44 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Codename | AD102 | GB202 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | August 15 2025 |
| Ranking | #16 | #15 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














