
RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4090 D

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,599 versus $4,095 for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 160% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+160%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,095) | ✅More affordable ($1,599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4090 D

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.

GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation scores 30,269 and the GeForce RTX 4090 D reaches 30,725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 114 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) with 400 Tensor cores vs 456.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,269 | 30,725+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800 | 14592+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS | 73.54 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+1% | 2520 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 400 | 456+14% |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB | 14.3 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 72 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100 | 114+14% |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 456+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 72 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 51.9% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-41% | 425W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 78°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.1+67% | 72.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000 MSRP and currently averages $4095, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $1599-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4095 | — |
| Codename | AD102 | AD102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | December 28 2023 |
| Ranking | #16 | #14 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














