RTX A4000H vs Arc A770M
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Arc A770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and Arc A770M
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000H scores 11,815 and the Arc A770M reaches 11,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the Arc A770M uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 4,096 (Arc A770M). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 32 (Arc A770M) with 192 Tensor cores vs 512.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815 | 11,853 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+14% | 16.79 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2050 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 96 | 128+33% |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+50% | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 512+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000H comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770M has 16 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 16 MB (Arc A770M) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.2 (Arc A770M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M). Decoder: None vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | None | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | None | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the Arc A770M's 120W — a 15.4% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 500W (Arc A770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 120W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 98.8+17% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | 2022 |
| Ranking | #226 | #225 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and Arc A770M
