RTX A4000H vs Radeon RX 7400
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7400.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 359.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+359.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and Radeon RX 7400
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000H scores 11,815 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815+1% | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+243% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+16% | 16.49 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2300 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+71% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+250% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: None vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | None | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | None | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 106% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 43W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 271.0+221% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 78.5% less ($728 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 361.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $199-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $199-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 58.6+361% |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #226 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and Radeon RX 7400
