RTX A4000H vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 91.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-91.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+91.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 59% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 367.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+367.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A4000H scores 11,815 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 91.7%. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 192 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815 | 22,651+92% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+41% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2535 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+41% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+40% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+41% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+41% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 55.6% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: None vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | None | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | None | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-13% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 141.6+68% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 59% less ($547 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 369.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $399-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $380-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 59.6+369% |
| Codename | GA104 | AD106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #226 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
