RTX A4000H vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 77% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 370.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+370.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A4000H scores 11,815 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 6.1%. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) with 192 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815 | 12,535+6% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+111% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1777 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+140% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+140% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+140% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 100% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: None vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | None | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 7.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 130W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 66°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 96.4+14% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 77.5% less ($718 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 372.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $249-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $209-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 60.0+372% |
| Codename | GA104 | GA106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #226 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
