CPU
GPU
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $349 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 62% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 174.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+174.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and Intel Arc Pro B50
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000H scores 11,815 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815 | 12,208+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+200% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+80% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2600 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+200% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: None vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | None | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | None | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 70W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 174.4+107% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 62.4% less ($578 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 175.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $349-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $349-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 35.0+176% |
| Codename | GA104 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #226 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and Intel Arc Pro B50
