RTX A4000H vs Radeon PRO V710
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO V710 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A4000H offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $927 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 54% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 112.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+112.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($927) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and Radeon PRO V710
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000H scores 11,815 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 54 (Radeon PRO V710) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815 | 12,000+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+78% | 3456 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2000 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 216+13% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+700% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 54+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: None vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | None | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | None | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 12.1% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-11% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4+11% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 and now averages $2000. The RTX A4000H costs 53.6% less ($1073 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the RTX A4000H offers 111.7% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-50% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927-54% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7+112% | 6.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #226 | #196 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and Radeon PRO V710
