RTX A4000H vs GeForce RTX 3060
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 43.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-43.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+43.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $289 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 69% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 361.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+361.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and GeForce RTX 3060
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX A4000H scores 11,815 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 43.8%. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX A4000H) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 192 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815 | 16,995+44% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+71% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+50% | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1777 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+71% | 3.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+71% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+71% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000H comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 24.4% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+24% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: None vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | None | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 19.4% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-18% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 100.0+18% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 68.8% less ($638 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 363% better value.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $329-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $289-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 58.8+363% |
| Codename | GA104 | GA106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #226 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and GeForce RTX 3060
