RTX A4000H vs Quadro P5200
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $240 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 74% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 280.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+280.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($240) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and Quadro P5200
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000H scores 11,815 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815+1% | 11,650 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+114% | 8.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1746 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+538% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4000H comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The RTX A4000H offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4000H) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | None | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 33.3% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 100W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4 | 116.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500 and now averages $240. The Quadro P5200 costs 74.1% less ($687 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 48.5 (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 offers 281.9% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $500-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $240-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 48.5+282% |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #226 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and Quadro P5200
