RTX A4000H vs Radeon Instinct MI60
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Instinct MI60.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Instinct MI60 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $600 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 52.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) | ✅More affordable ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4000H and Radeon Instinct MI60
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4000H scores 11,815 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4000H is built on Ampere while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX A4000H) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,815+2% | 11,638 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS+30% | 14.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1800 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4000H) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RTX A4000H) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: None vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: None (RTX A4000H) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | None | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | None | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4000H draws 140W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A4000H) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-53% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.4+118% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000H launched at $1000 MSRP and currently averages $927, while the Radeon Instinct MI60 launched at $6000 and now averages $600. The Radeon Instinct MI60 costs 35.3% less ($327 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.7 (RTX A4000H) vs 19.4 (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 offers 52.8% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX A4000H | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000-83% | $6000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $927 | $600-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.7 | 19.4+53% |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #226 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4000H and Radeon Instinct MI60
