CPU
GPU
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank 122 and the GeForce MX570 A is on rank 239, so the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX570 A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A500 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX570 A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and GeForce MX570 A
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 16 (GeForce MX570 A) with 64 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197 | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.468 TFLOPS+16% | 4.731 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz+16% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-20% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9+25% | 248.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A500 Embedded GPU and GeForce MX570 A
