
RTX A500 Embedded GPU vs Quadro K5200

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank 122 and the Quadro K5200 is on rank 254, so the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The RTX A500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Quadro K5200

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197 | 6,149 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.468 TFLOPS+54% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz+73% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 192+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 has 8 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 152.9% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-87% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9+656% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $70 |
| Codename | GA107S | GK110B |
| Release | March 30 2022 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #389 | #391 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















