
RTX A500 Embedded GPU vs Quadro M4000M

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank 122 and the Quadro M4000M is on rank 4, so the Quadro M4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The RTX A500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M4000M.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Quadro M4000M

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197 | 6,148 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.468 TFLOPS+119% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz+32% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+326% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 1.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-80% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9+404% | 61.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












