
RTX A500 Embedded GPU vs GeForce GTX 960

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank #122 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The RTX A500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 960 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 960.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and GeForce GTX 960

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the GeForce GTX 960 reaches 6,133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 960 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960). Raw compute: 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197+1% | 6,133 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.468 TFLOPS+127% | 2.413 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz+13% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (2nd Gen).
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (2nd Gen) |
| Codecs | — | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the GeForce GTX 960's 100W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 960). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-80% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 C |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9+406% | 61.3 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $45 |
| Codename | GA107S | GM206 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | January 22 2015 |
| Ranking | #389 | #393 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












