RTX A500 Embedded GPU vs Arc Graphics 130T
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank 122 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130T remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Arc Graphics 130T
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197 | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 2048+29157% | 7 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 82mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W | 15W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 82mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9 | 413.9+34% |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $250 |
| Codename | GA107S | — |
| Release | March 30 2022 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #389 | #386 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Arc Graphics 130T
