RTX A500 Embedded GPU vs Arc A380
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank #122 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A500 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A380 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Arc A380
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the Arc A380 reaches 6,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Arc A380 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 1,024 (Arc A380). Raw compute: 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 8 (Arc A380) with 64 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197 | 6,301+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.468 TFLOPS+30% | 4.198 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz | 2050 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+100% | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A380 has 6 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 4 MB (Arc A380) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A380). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | — | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the Arc A380's 75W — a 115.8% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 300W (Arc A380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 82mm vs 190mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-73% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 82mm | 190mm |
| Height | — | 114mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 59 |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9+269% | 84.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Arc A380
