
RTX A500 Embedded GPU vs Radeon R9 280X

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is positioned at rank #122 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The RTX A500 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 280X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 280X.
| Insight | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A500 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A500 Embedded GPU and Radeon R9 280X

RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU scores 6,197 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Raw compute: 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1335 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,197+2% | 6,100 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.468 TFLOPS+33% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1335 MHz+34% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) — the RTX A500 Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (11_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU draws 20W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 163.6% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-90% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 82mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 309.9+916% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | RTX A500 Embedded GPU | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | GA107S | Tahiti |
| Release | March 30 2022 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #389 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












