Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
VS
EPYC 7302

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs EPYC 7302

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 7302

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
775%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
6%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
14%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
146%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
130%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
91%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
91%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375EPYC 7302
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($109)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7302 (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375EPYC 7302
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($109)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and EPYC 7302

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,619 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

EPYC 7302

The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7302 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7302 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 33,619 against the EPYC 7302's 33,499 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 19,500 (13.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,864 vs 1,192, a 82.4% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,012 vs 10,254 (37.7% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375EPYC 7302
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+55%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
32 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Strix Point (2024−2025)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
33,619
33,499
Cinebench R23 Multi
22,246+14%
19,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,864+140%
1,192
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,012+46%
10,254
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7302 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7302 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 8 (EPYC 7302). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs 128 (EPYC 7302) — the EPYC 7302 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) and WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302).

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375EPYC 7302
Socket
FP8
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
128+700%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302). The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the EPYC 7302 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 targets Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming, EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 rivals Core i9-14900HX; EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375EPYC 7302
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 890M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, IOMMU
AMD-V, SEV
Target Use
Mobile Workstation / High-end Gaming
Server / Multi-thread Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 launched at $0 MSRP, while the EPYC 7302 debuted at $978. At current prices ($0 vs $109), the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is $109 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 375EPYC 7302
MSRP
$0-100%
$978
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$109
Performance per Dollar
307.3
Release Date
2025
2019