
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Xeon Gold 6416H
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Xeon Gold 6416H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Xeon Gold 6416H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Xeon Gold 6416H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Costs $696 less on MSRP ($1,149 MSRP vs $1,845 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $1,845 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (39,929 vs 40,606).
- ❌69.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 165W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6416H moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 280W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($1,845 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6416H better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs Xeon Gold 6416H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

Xeon Gold 6416H
The Xeon Gold 6416H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,606 points. Launch price was $1,444.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6416H offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6416H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6416H — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the Castle Peak (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 39,929 against the Xeon Gold 6416H's 40,606 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6416H. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6416H.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 18 / 36+13% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+77% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+42% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Castle Peak (2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 39,929 | 40,606+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6416H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6416H — the Xeon Gold 6416H supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6416H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6416H) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) and LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 6416H).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6416H). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314; Xeon Gold 6416H rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX was priced at $1149, while the Xeon Gold 6416H came in at $1845. On launch pricing ($1149 vs $1845), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX was $696 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX delivers 34.8 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6416H — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX the 44.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | Xeon Gold 6416H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1149-38% | $1845 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.8+58% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














