Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+32%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($368) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core i5-10400F
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 26 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX scores 62,261 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 130.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 42,986 vs 8,191 (136% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,260 vs 1,454, a 14.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,211 vs 5,783 (125.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+433% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+21% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+967% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 62,261+378% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,986+425% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,260 | 1,454+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,211+336% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+1500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX launched at $1337 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($368 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $266 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX delivers 169.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 27.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1337 | $160-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $368 | $102-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 169.2+32% | 127.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core i5-10400F
