Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon W-3345

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3345

24 Cores48 Thrd250 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon W-3345 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon W-3345 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon W-3345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
  • Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 216.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon W-3345

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (48,140 vs 48,756).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.3 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than Xeon W-3345?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX comes in $1,700 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 216.8% better value on MSRP (61.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs Xeon W-3345 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon W-3345

The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3345 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3345 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3345 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX scores 48,756 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon W-3345
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+13%
4 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+33%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB+78%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Chagall PRO (2022)
Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark
48,756+1%
48,140
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3345 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3345 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon W-3345
Socket
sWRX8
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
2048
4096+100%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3345). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon W-3345
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was priced at $799, while the Xeon W-3345 came in at $2499. On launch pricing ($799 vs $2499), Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX was $1700 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX delivers 61.0 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX the 104% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WXXeon W-3345
MSRP
$799-68%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
61.0+216%
19.3
Release Date
2022
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.