Sempron 145
Xeon 3.06
Sempron 145 vs Xeon 3.06 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Sempron 145 vs Xeon 3.06 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Sempron 145 vs Xeon 3.06: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Sempron 145
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 97W, a 52W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon 3.06
2003Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Sempron 145 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (535 vs 544).
- ❌115.6% higher power demand at 97W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Sempron 145 better than Xeon 3.06?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Sempron 145 vs Xeon 3.06 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Sempron 145
The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.
Xeon 3.06
The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Sempron 145 and Xeon 3.06 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Sempron 145 versus 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Sempron 145 uses the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon 3.06 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Sempron 145 scores 544 against the Xeon 3.06's 535 — a 1.7% lead for the Sempron 145. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Sempron 145 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06.
| Feature | Sempron 145 | Xeon 3.06 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.07 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-65% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Sargas (2009−2011) | Gallatin (2003−2004) |
| PassMark | 544+2% | 535 |
Memory & Platform
The Sempron 145 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 3.06 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Sempron 145 | Xeon 3.06 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Sempron 145 and Xeon 3.06
