Pentium M 770
VS
Sempron 145

Pentium M 770 vs Sempron 145

Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005
VS
AMD

Sempron 145

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 770 is positioned at rank 393 and the Sempron 145 is on rank 838, so the Pentium M 770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 770

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
100%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#380
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
538%
#381
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
530%
#382
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
487%
#383
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
485%
#384
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
480%
#386
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
464%
#387
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
445%
#388
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
444%
#389
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
432%
#393
Pentium M 770
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 145

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17193%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16246%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11796%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3554%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2815%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2462%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1410%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1392%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1267%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1267%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1253%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1219%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1202%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1197%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1187%
#838
Sempron 145
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#839
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
100%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
99%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
99%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
98%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
98%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 145 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 770 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 770Sempron 145
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 770Sempron 145
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 770 and Sempron 145

Intel

Pentium M 770

The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Sempron 145

The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 770 and Sempron 145 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 versus 2.8 GHz on the Sempron 145 — a 198.6% clock advantage for the Sempron 145 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Pentium M 770 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 145 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 770 scores 545 against the Sempron 145's 544 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium M 770. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 770Sempron 145
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.01 GHz
2.8 GHz+27900%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
2.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
90 nm
45 nm-50%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark
545
544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 770 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 145 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 770Sempron 145
Socket
PGA478
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%