Pentium M 770 vs Xeon 3.06

Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 3.06

1 Cores1 Thrd97 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······

Pentium M 770 vs Xeon 3.06 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 770 vs Xeon 3.06 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 770 vs Xeon 3.06: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 770

2005

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 27W instead of 97W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon 3.06

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 770 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (535 vs 545).
    • 259.3% higher power demand at 97W vs 27W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium M 770 better than Xeon 3.06?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 3.06 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium M 770 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium M 770 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium M 770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium M 770 vs Xeon 3.06 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium M 770

    The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Xeon 3.06

    The Xeon 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium M 770 and Xeon 3.06 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 versus 3.07 GHz on the Xeon 3.06 — a 198.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.06. The Pentium M 770 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Xeon 3.06 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 770 scores 545 against the Xeon 3.06's 535 — a 1.9% lead for the Pentium M 770. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 770 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.06.

    FeaturePentium M 770Xeon 3.06
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    0.01 GHz
    3.07 GHz+30600%
    Base Clock
    2.13 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    2 MB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB+300%
    512 kB
    Process
    90 nm-31%
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    Gallatin (2003−2004)
    PassMark
    545+2%
    535
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium M 770 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 3.06 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium M 770Xeon 3.06
    Socket
    PGA478
    PGA604
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%