Pentium M 770
VS
Xeon 3.20

Pentium M 770 vs Xeon 3.20

Intel

Pentium M 770

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 0.01 GHz2005
VS
Intel

Xeon 3.20

1 Cores1 Thrd97 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 770 is positioned at rank 393 and the Xeon 3.20 is on rank 1030, so the Pentium M 770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 770

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
100%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#380
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
538%
#381
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
530%
#382
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
487%
#383
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
485%
#384
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
480%
#386
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
464%
#387
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
445%
#388
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
444%
#389
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
432%
#393
Pentium M 770
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 3.20

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
305622%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
57704%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
51268%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
39606%
#1029
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
100%
#1030
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
100%
#1031
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
66%
#1032
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
41%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($10) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 3.20 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightPentium M 770Xeon 3.20
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gallatin (2003−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium M 770 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightPentium M 770Xeon 3.20
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 770 and Xeon 3.20

Intel

Pentium M 770

The Pentium M 770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.01 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon 3.20

The Xeon 3.20 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Gallatin (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 770 and Xeon 3.20 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.01 GHz on the Pentium M 770 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 3.20 — a 198.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 3.20. The Pentium M 770 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Xeon 3.20 uses Gallatin (2003−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 770 scores 545 against the Xeon 3.20's 575 — a 5.4% lead for the Xeon 3.20. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 770 vs 2 MB on the Xeon 3.20.

FeaturePentium M 770Xeon 3.20
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.01 GHz
3.2 GHz+31900%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
90 nm-31%
130 nm
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Gallatin (2003−2004)
PassMark
545
575+6%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 770 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 3.20 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium M 770Xeon 3.20
Socket
PGA478
PGA604
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%